Mohammed Latiff is well worth reading if only for the entertainment value. He talks about manifesting a “swimming pool full of money”.

Presumably he has a bank account full of water?

LoA seems to work in the same way that, when you have a broken leg, you notice that every other person you meet also has a broken leg. It is about what you are focusing on, Truth and reality are so complicated that nobody can “get it” in its entirety. Focus is a habit, so the courses in LoA can help people develop the habit of looking for the path to their goals, through the semantic noise we interpret as “reality.” What is wrong with that, specifically?
I think also the LoA is concerned with individual practice of taking responsibility for where one is right now. Similar to how overcoming addiction probably requires acceptance of the idea that the addicted person had something to do with their situation. There is no personal power in saying it is a “genetic predisposition” or one was abused as a child. The only path to achieving anythin is to singlemindedly assume responsibility for all outcomes. Nobody who has really achieved their goals believes it was accidental, or “genetic predisposition.” It always seems that a true success story is one where the person overcame the obstacles somehow. It does not follow from this, specifically that starving children in Indonesia chose their set of obstacles in some metaphysical way. This is not about accepting guilt or setting blame, but about personal resolve to achieve something.

Seems like lots of people are so beaten down by the happenstances of their upbringing that they are not able to see any options at all. The LoA is a way to talk about there being options. Just because they are not in the choices that we have received from our cultural setting does not mean there are none. All innovation is the result of individuals fighting the apparent set of choices and bringing in a new one.

The innovations that stick and become “the new paradigm” are always obvious after the fact. Maybe the LoA will be one of those obvious things, and maybe it won’t. It has existed, essentially as is, in the Unity Movement (and others) since the late 1800s. LoA is not a very new thing at all.

Call it what you like, what you may, generalize, categorize, label and contain, and it’s all fine. Depending on your interpretation, it may speak just to you, or it may speak to the masses, but somewhere, there is going to be some speaking, and those who want it in this form, will get it, and those who don’t won’t.

Either way, All is Well, so eloquently spoken by Abraham-Hicks.

Hugs,
Megan

http://www.thelawofattractionstation.com

…